MANUEL PARRADO, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• W. Fla. Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. SEE, 79 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 2012)
  …ers and the voters.” Id. Blank Application Not Protected Under Sections 766.101(5) and 395.0191(8) Sections 766.101 and 395.0191 are applicable to the peer review and credentialing process of hospitals and health care entities. See Cruger v. Love, 599 So. 2d 111, 112 (Fla.1992). These two statutes are very similar, with section 766.101 pertaining to peer review by a hospital medical review committee, and section 395.0191 pertaining to hospital staff membership privileges by a hospital licensing board. See §…
• Fla. Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. Buster, 984 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2008)
  …fter the information and records have been developed is quintessential retroactivity. As set out in footnote 7, the history of the statutory right was that it was a substantive part of the legislative scheme to reform health care. In Cruger v. Love, 599 So. 2d 111, 113 (Fla.1992), this Court made clear that the guarantee of confidentiality of peer review was an integral part of the Legislature’s plan to control the escalating cost of health care: [*496] The Florida Legislature enacted these peer review statut…
• Beverly Enterprises-Florida, Inc. v. Ives, 832 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
  …tion testimony adduced below shows that the information sought by Ives is shielded from discovery because it involves self-critical analysis or quality assurance information. This issue was considered by the Florida Supreme Court in Cruger v. Love, 599 So. 2d 111 (Fla.1992). In that opinion the court stated: The Florida Legislature enacted these peer review statutes in an effort to control the escalating cost of health care by encouraging self-regulation by the medical profession through peer review and eva…

Authorities Cited

• Rhoda Smith v. State, 598 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1992)
• Swift v. State, 582 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)