LUIS M. ACOSTA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-06-09
No. 91-3025
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
599 So. 2d 284 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions for possession of marijuana and cocaine. Defendant did not preserve for review the trial court’s failure to declare a mistrial, see Riechmann v. State, 581 So. 2d 133 (Fla.1991), or its failure to give the agreed upon cautionary instruction. Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701, 703 (Fla.1978); Crespo v. State, 505 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Furthermore, the record does not disclose that the prosecutor’s question constituted fundamental error. See Woodard v. State, 579 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Al Saggese v. Dep't OF Revenue OF The State OF Fla., 770 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
    …ists “129 Lehane Terrace, No. 1380” as the address. Since the notice requirements of Chapter 197 were followed, the alleged lack of receipt of the notice does not invalidate the tax deed sale. See Dawson, 608 So. 2d at 810; Murciano v. Jayan Corp., 599 So. 2d 284, 285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Levy v. Ippolito, 503 So. 2d 1308, 1311-12 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Stubbs v. Cummings, 336 So. 2d 412, 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). The trial court correctly concluded in its final summary judgment quieting title that “the Clerk str…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw