JACK BRYANT AND JOHN BRYANT, D/B/A BRYANT ELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
ROBERT S. FISHER, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-06-09
No. 92-336
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
599 So. 2d 285 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants/plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment entered following the grant of appellee/defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

The trial court erred in basing its summary judgment ruling on the defendant’s “uncontroverted expert testimony.” The plaintiffs in this case presented evidence which directly conflicted with the expert testimony, thereby showing that a genuine issue of material fact existed. Summary judgment was therefore improper. See Thrasher v. Koehring Co., 543 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw