LEONARD MARVIN SPIVEY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LEONARD MARVIN SPIVEY, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
599 So. 2d 785
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Taylor v. State, 583 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1991); Lynch v. State, 293 So. 2d 44 (Fla.1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Luchak v. State, 606 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…ause it violates the single subject rule of the Florida Constitution. However, we do not consider his attack on Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, because Luchak would have been habitual-ized under the pre-amended statute as well. See Ingram v. State, 599 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Gilbert v. State, 598 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (Warner, J., concurring specially); Hale v. State, 589 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); McNeil v. State, 588 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); King v. State, 585 So. 2d 1199 (F…
-
Elisames Harris v. State, 608 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Beaubrum v. State, 595 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Ingram v. State, 599 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Tims v. State, 592 So. 2d 741, 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).…
Authorities Cited
- Lynch v. State, 293 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1974)
- Taylor v. State, 583 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1991)