ROY NEBRASKA SCOTT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Extended Term Of Imprisonment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS, WOLF, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
SHIVERS, Judge.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing of our per curiam decision affirming the judgment and sentence of the trial court is denied. However, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v), we certify the following questions to be of great public importance:
1. DOES IT VIOLATE A DEFENDANT’S SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WHEN HE IS CLASSIFIED AS A VIOLENT FELONY OFFENDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 775.084, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), AND THEREBY SUBJECTED TO AN EXTENDED TERM OF IMPRISONMENT, IF HE HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF AN ENUMERATED VIOLENT FELONY WITHIN THE PREVIOUS FIVE YEARS, EVEN THOUGH HIS PRESENT OFFENSE IS A NONVIOLENT FELONY?
2. DOES SECTION 775.084(l)(b), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY BY INCREASING A DEFENDANT’S PUNISHMENT DUE TO THE NATURE OF A PRIOR OFFENSE?
See Hall v. State, 588 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), pet. for rev. pending, no. 79,-237; Tillman v. State, 586 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), pet. for rev. pending, no. 78,715; Perkins v. State, 583 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA), jurisdiction accepted, 590 So. 2d 421 (Fla.1991).
AFFIRMED.
WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Scott v. State, 612 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 1992)…OVERTON, Justice. We have for review Scott v. State, 600 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which the district court certified the same questions we recently answered in the negative in Tillman v. State, 609 So. 2d 1295 (Fla.1992). We choose not to consider the other issues raised by the petitioner since they were n…
-
Gladfelter v. State, 604 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)….Crim.P. 3.800(b). We have repeatedly held, however, that as long as the requirement to pay restitution is included in the sentence, setting the actual amount of restitution, even beyond sixty days from the sentence, is permissible. Savory v. State, 600 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), approved in part, corrected on other grounds Savory v. State, 600 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); In the Interest of B.M., 580 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Stanley v. State, 580 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We affirm as to t…1 / 2
-
State v. Sanderson, 615 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. We deny the petition for writ of certiorari. In so doing, we acknowledge conflict with Savory v. State, 600 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) and Smith v. State, 589 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Isaiah Perkins v. State, 583 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Leshawn Tillman v. State, 586 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Hall v. State, 588 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)