CARLOS AZPIAZU, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CARLOS AZPIAZU, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
600 So. 2d 51
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Lareau v. State, 573 So. 2d 813 (Fla.1991); Davis v. State, 517 So. 2d 670 (Fla.1987); Ware v. State, 596 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reis v. Reis, 739 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…the number of hours reasonably expended and the reasonable hourly rate, the failure to have more explicit findings is harmless error under Rowe.” Blits v. Renaissance Cruises, Inc., 647 So. 2d 971, 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); see also Civile v. Civile, 600 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). The attorney’s fee award is affirmed. In the former husband’s third point, he argues that the equitable distribution award must be reversed because of a lack of jurisdiction to make the award. The trial court in this case entere…
-
Wanda and Eric Teat v. City OF Apalachicola, 880 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…rt a court’s award of attorney’s fees.” Id. at 351. This holding, however, should not be read to preclude the application of section 59.041, Florida Statutes, and the harmless error analysis under the appropriate circumstances. See Civile v. Civile; 600 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Reis v. Reis, 739 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). In Powerhouse, Inc. v. Walton, 557 So. 2d [*821] 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), we recognized that appellate courts are mandated to perform a harmless error analysis by section 59.041, F…
Authorities Cited
- Hervey Lareau v. State, 573 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1991)
- Davis v. State, 517 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 1987)
- Pearison Ware v. State, 596 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)