ROBERT GRANT AND KIM GRANT, APPELLANTS,
v.
CHARLES WHITCHURCH, SR. AND DALE WHITCHURCH, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1992-06-10
No. 91-2463
GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur., LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.
600 So. 2d 512 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse a summary judgment for the defendants. The trial court erred by striking paragraph 5(c) of the amended complaint. Therefore, there remain issues of fact whether the defendants, in the conduct of their babysitting service, are liable for the negligent supervision of, or a failure to supervise, the plaintiffs’ child.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Grant v. Whitchurch, 614 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
    …he trial court dismissed (a) through (c) and granted summary judgment in favor of the Whitchurches as to (d). In the first appeal, we reversed that summary judgment upon a holding that the trial court had erred in striking (c). Grant v. Whitchurch, 600 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). That subparagraph alleged that the Whitchurches failed to: exercise reasonable care with respect to KRISTY GRANT under all circumstances when she was in the care, custody and control of CHARLES WHIT-CHURCH, SR., and DALE WHIT-C…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw