FREDERICK L. HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1992-06-17
No. 91-02590
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and DANAHY and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
600 So. 2d 548 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in imposing the same sentence after a prior remand, as the rationale of Goene v. State did not apply and the original scoresheet must be used.


Facts & Procedural History

The appellant challenged sentences imposed for probation violation for the second time after a prior remand. The trial judge resentenced based on the …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Frederick L. Harris, for the second time, challenges the sentences which the trial court imposed for violation of probation. We once again reverse and remand for resentencing.

This court in Harris v. State, 574 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), remanded the cause for resentencing. On remand, the trial judge accepted the state’s argument that based upon the rationale of Goene v. State, 577 So. 2d 1306 (Fla.1991), he could impose the same sentence. However, there was no indication that the appellant took any affirmative action to mislead the trial court concerning his prior record. Thus, Goene does not apply.

We, therefore, once again reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court follow this court’s mandate in Harris, i.e. the trial court must use the original scoresheet in determining the sentence to be imposed. Pursuant to the holding of Williams v. State, 594 So. 2d 273 (Fla.1992), the sentences may be bumped one cell for each violation of probation.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and DANAHY and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw