WILLIAM MILLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court summarily denied the motion as untimely. Appellant’s judgment and sentence were not final for purposes of rule 3.850 until this court issued its mandate in the direct appeal on October 12, 1990. See Huff v. State, 569 So. 2d 1247, 1250 (Fla.1990); Ferris v. State, 575 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Therefore, we find that appellant’s November 19, 1991, motion was timely filed within the two year period provided by rule 3.850. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, WARNER and POLEN, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.G. v. State, 718 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…ion for the non-jewelry losses since they were not caused either directly or indirectly by the offense to which he pled, i.e., grand theft of miscellaneous jewelry. The cases which appellant cites in support of his argument, In the Interest of J.M., 601 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Salvador v. State, 601 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1992); and Mansingh v. State, 588 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), hold that restitution is limited to damage or loss caused directly or indirectly by the defendant’s offense. Howev…
-
In the Interest of D.L.A., 667 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…d of having committed a delinquent act of the right to counsel at each stage of the proceeding and ensure, by a “thorough inquiry,” that any waiver of that right has been freely and intelligently made, we reverse. See, e.g., In the Interest of J.M., 601 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); K.M. v. State, 448 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); R.V.P. v. State, 395 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). On remand, the trial court shall advise appellant fully regarding his right to counsel and, should appellant indicate a desi…
-
M.H. v. State, 698 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…ason, the court required no present payment. To revisit the payment issue at a later date is consistent with Chapter 39. This was not a case where the court ordered payments without making any inquiry into the child’s ability to pay. Cf. In re J.M., 601 So. 2d 604, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Only where a court orders an unemployed child to begin making restitution payments must it “determine what the child may reasonably be expected to earn upon finding suitable employment and base the amount of restitution on…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Huff v. State, 569 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 1990)
- Ferris v. State, 575 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)