JOHN ROSSMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Schenck v. State, 654 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …faculties. Explain: [handwritten] [defendant] treated for hallucinations currently by Dr. Tinzlef?] [pre-printed] I am not currently under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The above statements are equivocal and contradictory. See Hull v. State, 601 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.…
• Rivera v. State, 651 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …n this medication to the court. He claims that the medication prevented him from understanding what was happening at the hearing. The trial court properly requested a response from the state attorney before ruling on this motion. See Hull v. State, 601 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Reutter v. State, 590 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Campbell v. State, 488 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). The state attorney responded and requested an extension of time in which to obtain transcripts of the plea and sentencing…
• Sylvette Barreto v. State, 50 So. 3d 738 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …he had just told the Court that the medication clouds her judgment. The assurances provided by the Appellant that her mental state was clear were “equivocal and contradictory” Schenck v. State, 654 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); see Hull v. State, 601 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). [*739] The Appellant’s statements contradict also the written plea form, which states “I am not under the influence of alcohol or any drug at this time.” Szeremi v. State, 862 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). (Internal record cita…

Authorities Cited

• Tillman v. State, 592 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)