IN THE INTEREST OF C.K., A MINOR, V.K., NATURAL MOTHER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Manifest Best Interests Of The Child cases and more on FLexlaw
PATTERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from the termination of her parental rights, V.K. raises seven issues. We find merit in only one and reverse.
Neither the trial court’s order terminating parental rights nor the transcript of the proceedings establishes that the court considered or evaluated the factors listed in section 39.467(2)(a)-(k), Florida Statutes (1991), in reaching its determination that the termination of parental rights is in the manifest best interests of the child. Thus, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court conduct further proceedings to consider each factor in section 39.467(2) and render an appropriate written order setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law. See In the Interest of R.J., 586 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court should then reassess whether C.K.’s manifest best interests require the termination of V.K.’s parental rights.
Reversed and remanded.
PARKER, A.C.J., and BENTLEY, E. RANDOLPH, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In the Interest of A.C. and A.M. v. State, 751 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…H., 670 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (reversing an order terminating parental rights and remanding for further proceedings because the order of termination failed to give detailed attention to the manifest best interests of the child); In re C.K., 601 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (reversing an order terminating parental rights and remanding for further proceedings because neither the order nor the transcript established that the trial court had considered the required statutory factors). In this case, nei…
-
In the interest of K.M. and A.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 788 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…f parental rights as to the mother and remand for the trial court to conduct further proceedings to consider all of the statutory factors under section 39.810 and enter an appropriate written order with factual findings. See In the Interest of C.K., 601 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). ALTENBERND and SALCINES, JJ., concur.…
-
Jacobs Wind Elec. Co., Inc. v. Dep't OF Transp., 626 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. 1993)…BARKETT, Chief Justice. We have for review Department of Transportation v. Padgett, 601 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA1992), which certified a question of great public importance. The issue presented is whether a state court has jurisdiction over takings and conversion claims against the state with respect to property that is the subject of a patent wh…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In the Interest of R.J., 586 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)