ROBERT LEE HENRY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Sickon v. The Sch. Bd. OF Alachua Cnty., 719 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …em to support her contention that, where the Fourteenth Amendment would require hearings, even so-called “name-clearing hearings,” the Administrative Procedure Act has been construed to allow hearings under the Act. See Yunker v. University of Fla., 602 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); see generally Garcia v. Walder Elecs., Inc., 563 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Cornwell v. University of Fla., 307 So. 2d 203, 210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (“A professor is, and should be, entitled to a hearing if his reputation, go…
• Fertally v. Miami-Dade Cmty. Coll., 651 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …ision by Miami-Dade not to offer a new annual contract, or a continuing contract, after expiration of the present contract period. Appellant’s annual contract has expired in accordance with its terms. We distinguish Yunker v. University of Florida, 602 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In that case the University of Florida notified an annual contract research scientist that the University would not renew his annual contract. The court noted that under the then-applicable administrative rule, Yunker had no rig…
• J.M. v. Fla. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 938 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …ency asserted other, statutorily prescribed hearing procedures sufficed); Sickon v. Sch. Bd. of Alachua County, 719 So. 2d 360, 361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (reviewing denial of a request for formal hearing under section 120.57); Yunker v. Univ. of Fla., 602 So. 2d 557, 557 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (same). See also Fla. R.App. P. 9.190(b)(2)(2006). The present case arrives in a very different procedural posture than that in which Ford v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 932 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), came to…

Authorities Cited

• Jamison v. State, 583 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)