CHARLES A. OWENS, CATTLEMEN'S REAL ESTATE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND CAPE INVESTMENT REALTY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
CANE SERVICES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ROBERTO DE GUARDIOLA, ROBERTO DE GUARDIOLA, JR., ROGERS (BILLY) CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ANGUS INVESTMENTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, EDWIN A. JONES, TRIANGLE SOD FARMS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A FOREIGN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ANDREW E. HELGESEN AND ROBERT MATTHEWS, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1992-05-06
No. 91-1225
ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.
602 So. 2d 564 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1992) Caution
Cited by 5 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee Triangle Sod Farms Limited Partnership’s motion for clarification, withdraw our opinion of March 11, 1992 and substitute the following:

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of Count IV of appellants’ amended third amended complaint against appel-lees Andrew Helgesen and Triangle Sod Farms Limited Partnership. See Norris & Associates of Naples, Inc. v. Elkins, 570 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We reverse the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of Count I of appellants’ amended third amended complaint as to appellees Angus Investments, Inc. and Edwin A. Jones. The complaint, though inartfully drafted, contains sufficient allegations to state a cause of action against these appel-lees for breach of contract.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • The Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs. v. I.C., 742 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …operations of the agency. See State, ex rel. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Servs. v. Sepe, 291 So. 2d 108, 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), superseded by statute on other grounds as recognized in Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Servs. v. Stoutamire, 602 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). In Rilla White Foundation, Inc., 720 So. 2d at 573, we determined that the trial court had the authority to investigate whether placement at that facility might pose safety concerns for the particular dependent children whose cas…
  • State v. Morrison, 727 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
    …vices v. Sepe, 291 [*406] So. 2d 108, 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); see also, State ex rel. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Nourse, 437 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). But see Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Stoutamire, 602 So. 2d 564, 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The trial court may, of course, make a nonbinding recommendation regarding the defendant’s placement or manner of treatnient.1 We next address the Department’s reliance on section 985.225, Florida Statutes (1997), which sta…
    1 / 2
  • Dep't OF Child. & Fam. Servs. v. M.H. & State of Fla., 830 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
    …our power to rewrite the statute to impose time limitations that the legislature evidently thought were unnecessary or impractical. Second, the 'children rely on this court’s decision in Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Stoutamire, 602 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Stoutamire is a fact-specific case in which this court approved a judicially mandated plan of treatment for a mentally ill criminal defendant. The decision emphasized that its holding was “grounded in the very unusual facts of th…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw