JOHN CHAMBERLAIN, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF SARASOTA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1992-08-14
No. 91-03953
LEHAN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
602 So. 2d 702 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*703] PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint against the City of Sarasota for, inter alia, a declaratory judgment and damages resulting from alleged inverse condemnation. We reverse.

Whether or not a legally cognizable property right of plaintiff exists which might support plaintiff’s claims appears to depend, at least in part, upon whether or not the property in question is owned by plaintiff or, on the other hand, has been dedicated to public use. The complaint alleges that the property is owned by plaintiff and has not been so dedicated. While the city argues various bases for its position that the property has been dedicated, that appears to be a matter depending upon facts which cannot be determined solely on the basis of the pleadings at this stage.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

LEHAN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Thomas v. State, 616 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
    …. The State is free to [*181] properly notice the defendant of a future hearing on this issue, at which time the defendant may dispute the amount of the lien if he so desires. Klarstrom v. State, 610 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Carroll v. State, 602 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). AFFIRM; QUASH LIEN and REMAND. GOSHORN, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.…
  • Owens v. State, 616 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
    …appeal, we have identified two minor sentencing errors. First, the public defender’s fee in the judgment are stricken and the matter remanded for the required notice and opportunity for the defendant to be heard before assessment. Carroll v. State, 602 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and cases cited therein. Second, there is no authority for imposition of a state attorney’s fee and it is stricken. Smith v. State, 606 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED in part and REMANDED.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw