APPAREL AFFILIATES, INC., AND LARRY BISCHOFF, APPELLANTS,
v.
NORMAN COREN, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, J., concurs.
LETTS, J., concurs specially with opinion.
ANSTEAD, J., dissents in part with opinion.
LETTS, Judge,
specially concurring.
I specially concur only to record the reason why I do not agree with Judge An-stead’s partial dissent. As I read the written agreement in this case, the commission was based on a “net agreed selling price (includ[ing] labor, cutting, duty and transportation).” Under the facts, I believe the words “transportation” and “freight” to be synonymous.
ANSTEAD, Judge,
dissenting in part.
The trial court awarded appellee damages for breach of contract. I dissent only to the extent that I believe the evidence fails to sustain the trial court’s inclusion of certain freight charges used as a predicate for computing appellee’s sales commission. I would remand with directions that the damages be reduced accordingly. In all other respects I concur in the affirmance.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Allstar Builders Corp., Inc. v. Zimmerman, 706 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…asserting that the fee judgment was premature. The Rule 9.400(c) motion is the correct vehicle to review this judgment. Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc., 638 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Hernstadt v. Brickell Bay Club Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 602 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). “[I]n an interlocutory appeal, the party prevailing on the interlocutory appeal must also be the ultimate prevailing party in the trial court to be entitled to a final judgment of appellate fees from the interlocutory appeal.”…