THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
GUS JONES, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-08-04
No. 92-351
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
602 So. 2d 991 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals a non-final order granting defendant Gus Jones’ motion to suppress evidence. We conclude that defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the bag containing his personal belongings; that the display of the contents of the bag cannot be deemed purely private action in this instance, see 1 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 1.8(b) (1987); and that there was no applicable exception to the warrant requirement, merit in the cross-appeal. We find no

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Brown v. State, 617 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
    …952 (Fla.1992); State v. Boat-wright, 559 So. 2d 210 (Fla.1990); Highsmith v. State, 595 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). . A similar result was reached by the third district in McGahee v. State, 600 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), and Mulkey v. State, 602 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw