CHARLES HOWARD GIPSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Gipson v. State, 616 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1993)
  …SHAW, Justice. We have for review Gipson v. State, 603 So. 2d 64 (Fla.2d DCA 1992), which relied on Boomer v. State, 596 So. 2d 730 (Fla.2d DCA 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve Gipson. Gipson was convicted of numerous drug-related crimes and sentenced to two concurrent guidel…
• C.A.K. v. State, 661 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …case. If a trial judge continues the proceeding, rather than declaring a mistrial, and arranges for another attorney to represent the juvenile in the remainder of the case, a technical violation of double jeopardy may be avoided. See R.M. v. State, 603 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).…
• State v. T.D., 837 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …, but we affirm the trial court’s exercise of discretion in dismissing the case. T.D.’s crime was to be tried by the trial judge. And, in the case of a bench trial, jeopardy attaches when the court begins to hear evidence. See, e.g., R.M. v. State, 603 So. 2d 64, 65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). In Bernard v. State, 261 So. 2d 133, 135 (Fla.1972), our supreme court held that a court begins to hear evidence when “the first witness is actually placed on the stand and begins to testify.” Here, no witness ever took the s…

Authorities Cited

• Wood v. State, 593 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
• Boomer v. State, 596 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)