H. L. CONDON, APPELLANT,
v.
PORTER H. SMITH, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's order, finding no errors in its judgment. The court also awarded costs to the appellee.
The Florida Supreme Court found no errors in the Circuit Court's order and therefore affirmed it.
“the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of the judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order”
This quote explains the court's basis for affirming the lower court's order.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court. The record of the order and briefs from both parties were submitted to the Florida Sup…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Per Curiam.
This cause having been submitted to the court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the order appealed from and briefs of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of the judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed. It is further ordered that the appellee do have and recover of and from the appellant his costs by him in this behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of f.........................................................., all of which is ordered to be certified to the court below.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Harry Church v. Yeats, 74 Fla. 509 (Fla. 1917)…that in practical operation the statute will effectuate prohibition in violation of Article XIX of the constitution. It does not appear to me beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute violates Article XIX of the constitution. See Lassiter v. Bryan, 67 Fla. 478, 65 South. Rep. 590.…