MERLENE WALKER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1992-09-03
No. 79197
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur., GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs., McDONALD, J., dissents., HARDING, J., concurs.
603 So. 2d 508 Florida Supreme Court (1992)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So. 2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. Walker, 588 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Walker’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs.

McDONALD, J., dissents.

Dissent
GRIMES, Justice,

GRIMES, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So. 2d 504 (Fla.1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw