CHARLES SODERLIND AND GUS A. SODERLIND, APPELLANTS,
v.
FRANCIS C. BRENT, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree, finding no errors after reviewing the record and arguments presented. The court ordered the appellants to pay costs to the appellee.
The Florida Supreme Court found no errors in the Circuit Court's decree.
“This cause having been submitted to the court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the decree appealed from and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree”
Describes the court's review process and initial finding.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellants Charles Soderlind and Gus A. Soderlind appealed a decree from the Circuit Court. The case was submitted to the Florida Supreme Court with a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Award Of Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
This cause having been submitted to the court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the decree appealed from and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed; it is further ordered that the appellee do have and recover of and from the appellants his costs by him in this behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of $......................................................, all of which is ordered to be certified to the court below.