UNION AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
LUIS FERNANDEZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-08-11
No. 92-633
Before HUBBART and FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
603 So. 2d 653 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the insurer Union American Insurance Company from a final summary judgment which finds automobile liability insurance coverage for its insured Luis Fernandez in an auto accident in which Fernandez’ minor son [who lived in insured’s household] was the driver of the insured automobile. We reverse and remand for a trial on the merits as to the following issues inter alia (1) whether the insured misrepresented on his application for insurance that the only drivers of the insured automobile were himself and his wife, when, arguably, his minor son may have also been a driver of said automobile; and (2) if so, whether this was a material misrepresentation. If such a material misrepresentation is established at trial, the subject insurance policy would be void ab initio and, accordingly, there would be no liability insurance coverage for the subject accident. Life Ins. Co. of Va. v. Shifflet, 201 So. 2d 715 (Fla.1967); Abrams v. General Ins. Co., 508 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Fla., Inc. v. Mignolet, 475 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Salgado, 22 So. 3d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …z v. Eagle Ins. Co., 948 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“Florida law indeed gives an insurer the unilateral right to rescind its insurance policy on the basis of misrepresentation in the application of insurance.”); Union Am. Ins. Co. v. Fernandez, 603 So. 2d 653, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (reversing and remanding for trial on issue of material misrepresentation in insurance application; stating that “[i]f such a material misrepresentation is established at trial, the subject insurance policy would be void ab i…
  • Mercury Ins. Co. OF Fla. v. Cletus Cooper, 919 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …in jeopardy if he was not at the wheel. See § 627.409(1), Fla. Stat. (2004)(“A misrepresentation, omission, concealment of fact, or incorrect statement may prevent recovery under [a] contract or policy....”); Union Am. Ins. [*497] Co. v. Fernandez, 603 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)(concluding that factual issue existed regarding whether insured misrepresented drivers of vehicle on application); Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. Papasodero, 587 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)(material misrepresentation concerning dri…
  • …v. Eagle Ins. Co., 948 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“Florida law indeed gives an insurer the unilateral right to rescind its insurance , policy on the basis of misrepresentation in the application of insurance.”); Union Am. Ins. Co, v. Fernandez, 603 So. 2d 653, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (stating that if a material misrepresentation is established at trial, “the subject insurance policy would be void ah initio ”).…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw