STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
NATHANIEL WILSON, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1992-09-16
No. 92-1116
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and HERSEY, J., concur., STONE, J., concurs specially with opinion.
604 So. 2d 578 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and HERSEY, J., concur. STONE, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurrence
STONE, Judge,

STONE, Judge,

concurring specially.

I would certify the same issue certified in Nero v. State, 604 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Palmer v. State, 602 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and Williams v. State, 593 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …panel); J.J.F. of Palm Beach v. State Farm, 634 So. 2d 1089 (Fla.4th DCA1994) (although coverage issue is a question for the court, the trial court may not disturb an arbitration award under rubric of deciding coverage issue); State Farm v. Wingate, 604 So. 2d 578 (Fla.4th DCA1992) (where the insurer voids a policy due to the circumstances surrounding the loss the initial issue, to be decided by the court and not the arbitrator, is whether there is coverage for the loss); Allstate v. Banaszak, 561 So. 2d 465…
  • Atencio v. U.S. Sec. Ins. Co., 676 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …policy interpretation and coverage are ordinarily for the court, rather than arbitrators or appraisers, to decide. See Roe, 533 So. 2d 279; Meade v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co., 423 So. 2d 908 (Fla.1982); State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wingate, 604 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Bruno v. Travelers Ins. Co., 386 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Applying these rules, the order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for further consistent proceedings including determination of the validity of the a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw