J.D., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
J.D., a juvenile, appealed his delinquency convictions for trespass to a conveyance and possession of burglary tools. The court affirmed the trespass conviction but reversed the burglary tools conviction, finding insufficient evidence that the car keys were possessed with intent to commit burglary or trespass.
The court affirmed the trespass to a conveyance conviction, holding that J.D. willfully entered the stolen vehicle with knowledge it was stolen and participated in concealing its stolen character. The court reversed the burglary tools conviction, finding no evidence the car keys were possessed with intent to commit burglary or trespass, as they were used to conceal a prior offense rather than to gain entry.
[1] A finding of guilt for trespass to a conveyance is supported by evidence that the defendant knew the vehicle was stolen when entering it and willfully entered with that k…
[2] Lending one's car keys to conceal the stolen nature of a vehicle supports a finding that the defendant was a willing participant in the offense of trespass to a conveyanc…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The trial court was entitled to believe on this evidence that the respondent had knowledge that the car was stolen when he entered the vehicle in view of the damage to the car ignition, radio, and speakers, and that he willfully entered the vehicle with such knowledge”
Establishes the basis for affirming the trespass conviction—that J.D.'s knowledge and willfulness could be inferred from the visible signs of theft and his subsequent actions.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJ.D. was arrested as a passenger in a stolen car driven by a school acquaintance. The car's ignition had been punched out, the radio removed, and spea…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Intent To Commit Burglary Or Trespass cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the respondent J.D. from a finding of guilt, a withholding of adjudication, and an order placing the respondent on community control for (1) trespass to a conveyance [§ 810.08, Fla.Stat. (1991)], and (2) possession of burglary tools [§ 810.06, Fla.Stat. (1991) ] in a juvenile delinquency proceeding below. We affirm the delinquency conviction for trespass to a conveyance, but reverse the delinquency conviction for possession of burglary tools.
First, as to the trespass conviction, the state’s evidence at trial established that the respondent was arrested one evening while travelling as a passenger in a stolen car driven by a school acquaintance of the respondent. The car ignition had been punched out, the car radio had been removed, and the speakers to the car radio were missing. There was a set of car keys in the ignition, which the respondent admitted to the police belonged to him; the respondent, however, denied stealing the car.
At trial, the respondent testified that he knew the car was stolen but that he discovered this only after he had entered the car, the car was travelling on the Palmetto Expressway, and he was unable to exit the vehicle. As a consequence, the respondent contends on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on this charge because, he asserts, the charged trespass was not willful.
We disagree.
The trial court was entitled to believe on this evidence that the respondent had knowledge that the car was stolen when he entered the vehicle in view of the damage to the car ignition, radio, and speakers, and that he willfully entered the vehicle with such knowledge; moreover, the respondent later lent his car keys to the driver to place in the car ignition so that the stolen character of the vehicle might be concealed, which further supports a finding that the respondent was a willing, guilty participant in the offense of trespass to a conveyance. D.L. v. State, 567 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); M.F. v. State, 562 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); G.C. v. State, 560 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), approved, 572 So. 2d 1380 (Fla.1991).
Second, as to the possession of burglary tools conviction, however, we agree with the respondent that no evidence was adduced below that the respondent’s car keys were possessed with intent to commit a burglary or a trespass. Plainly, the car keys were not used to break into the stolen car or to drive the car after the break-in. To the contrary, the keys were used to cover up the prior offense of burglary and trespass, rather than to gain entry into or to drive the subject car. Thomas v. State, 531 So. 2d 708 (Fla.1988).
The delinquency conviction for trespass to a conveyance, together with the order placing the respondent on community control, is affirmed; the delinquency conviction for possession of burglary tools is reversed and the respondent is discharged therefrom.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Thomas v. State, 531 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1988)
- State v. G.C., 572 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 1991)
- G.C. v. State, 560 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- M.F. v. State, 562 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- Receveur v. State, 567 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)