GREGORY LEE BRIDGES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1992-09-25
No. 91-2592
Dauksch, J., W. Sharp, J., Harris, J.
604 So. 2d 943 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1992)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Appellant's convictions for cocaine delivery and possession were affirmed, but his sentences for delivery were reversed because a conditional suspended sentence violates the habitual felony offender statute's mandatory term-of-years requirement.


Holding

A conditional suspended sentence is an unauthorized sentencing alternative under the habitual felony offender statute, which mandates a term of years and does not permit straight probation.


Headnotes

[1] Under the habitual felony offender statute, a conditional suspended sentence is an unauthorized sentencing alternative, and the statute mandates a term of years without p…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of two counts of cocaine delivery and two counts of cocaine possession. The trial court found him an habitual felony offender …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was tried and convicted of two counts of delivery of cocaine1 and two counts of possession of cocaine.2 The trial court found that appellant was an habitual felony offender and sentenced him to two concurrent eight year terms of incarceration for the two counts of possession (counts 2' and 4) and two concurrent fifteen year terms of incarceration for the two counts of delivery (counts 1 and 3), to be served consecutive to the eight year terms. However, the fifteen year terms were suspended upon appellant successfully completing five years probation. We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for the two counts of possession, but reverse the sentences for the two counts of delivery (counts 1 and 3) and remand for resentencing.

The sentence of fifteen years suspended after completion of probation constitutes a “conditional suspended sentence” as in Bryant v. State, 591 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA1992) and is an unauthorized sentencing alternative. Even if construed as a straight term of probation, the penalty is improper because in State v. Kendrick, 596 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA1992), review pending, No. 79,953, this court held that the habitual felony offender statute mandates a sentence of a term of years and does not allow imposition of straight probation. Therefore, appellant’s sentences for counts 1 and 3 are reversed and remanded for imposition of legal sentences. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur. . § 893.13(l)(a)(l), Fla.Stat. (1991).

. § 893.13(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1991).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw