SALVATORE VOLA, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1992-09-24
No. 79455
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
604 So. 2d 1233 Florida Supreme Court (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We review State v. Vola, 591 So. 2d 248, 250 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), in which the court certified the same question answered by this Court in Scales v. State, 603 So. 2d 504 (Fla.1992). Upon the authority of Scales, we answer the certified question in the affirmative. We quash the decision below and remand with directions to reinstate Vola’s community control.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Blount v. State, 641 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
    …and fourteen rolls, the state maintains that the “use” of the check ceases to be personal and becomes non-personal. This distinction is not found in Camp, and it is doubtful that it can be applied in any consistent fashion. See also State v. Cowhig, 604 So. 2d 1233 (Fla.1992) (cashing stolen checks for personal benefit does not constitute dealing in stolen property); Burch v. State, 602 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (negotiating a stolen $210 check for cash is not dealing). We conclude that the critical conc…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw