WILLIAM E. LARSON, PETITIONER,
v.
THE HONORABLE MEL GROSSMAN, AS CIRCUIT JUDGE FOR THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court cannot deny a motion to substitute counsel solely to discipline the attorney, especially when the client has the right to choose their counsel.
Petitioner's attorney left his former firm, taking the client. The former firm alleged unethical conduct. The trial court denied the client's motion t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Bar Code Of Professional Responsibility cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner requests a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to grant a motion to substitute counsel. We grant the writ.
This dispute involves the manner in which petitioner’s counsel in a personal injury suit left his former firm, taking petitioner as his client. The former firm complained loudly that the attorney’s conduct and actions were unethical and, if the allegations are true, illegal. When petitioner moved to substitute his attorney for the attorney’s former firm, the trial court denied the same based upon the allegations of how petitioner’s attorney had acquired the file from the former firm.
While the trial court’s concern for preventing what may be a violation of ethics is commendable, the court does not have the power to discipline the attorney by refusing to allow him to participate in the case. See Pantori, Inc. v. Stephenson, 384 So. 2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). If after considering the issue, the court believes that violations of the Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility have occurred, then the trial judge should initiate disciplinary proceedings through the Bar. Florida Bar Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(B)(3). However, so long as the attorney is in good standing with the Bar and the substitution of attorneys will not interfere with the orderly functioning of the court, see Fisher v. State, 248 So. 2d 479 (Fla.1971) (delay in trial), or prejudice the opposing party by creating unfair advantage, cf. Pantori, Inc. (revelation of confidential secrets to attorney who represented opposing party in prior proceedings), the client has a right to choose his own counsel. See also Chauvet v. Estate of Chauvet, 599 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Thus, we grant the petition for writ of mandamus in case number 92-1826 and quash the order denying substitution of counsel.
ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissenting without opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dina J. Grossman v. Jewish Cmty. Ctr. OF Greater Fort Lauderdale Inc., 704 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…its employees with a tolerable work environment is good cause for leaving employment attributable to the employer. See Lovett v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 547 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Wilson v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 604 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). A tolerable work environment includes the employer refraining from inflicting verbal abuse upon the employee. See Gollet Enters. E., Inc. v. Fla Unemploy [*717] ment Appeals Comm’n, 630 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)(holding ve…
-
Fran T. Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Jacobs & Goodman, P.A., 633 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…ovide Brown with a tolerable work environment is good cause for leaving employment attributable to the employer. Lovett v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 547 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Wilson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 604 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). In Lovett, the court found that the employer’s failure to intercede in a dispute between appellant and a coemployee was sufficient to meet the good cause standard and avoid loss of unemployment compensation benefits. Lovett, 547…
-
Mattice v. State of Fla., Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Broward Plastic Surgery, PA, 992 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…tantial change in an employee’s work hours, there is a material and unilateral breach of specific terms of the parties’ employment agreement which constitutes good cause attributable to the employer. E.g., Wilson v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 604 So. 2d 1274, 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). In this case, the UAC agreed with the appeals referee’s finding of fact, but reversed his conclusion of law. In doing so, the UAC improperly overturned the appeals referee’s finding, as there was competent, substantial ev…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fisher v. State, 248 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 1971)
- Pantori, Inc. v. Stephenson, 384 So. 2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Chauvet v. In re Est. OF Pierre Chauvet, 599 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)