CHARLES H. DOAN, APPELLANT,
v.
AMELIA RETREAT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1992-09-21
No. 91-04080
BOOTH, SMITH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
604 So. 2d 1292 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992) Caution
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

In this condominium dispute, the court reversed the trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss and compel arbitration, holding that a dispute over the validity of a bylaws amendment prohibiting short-term leases was arbitrable because resolving it would necessarily require construction of the declaration, which contained an arbitration clause.


Holding

The court held that the dispute was arbitrable because determining the validity of the bylaws amendment would necessarily require construction of the declaration, which contained an arbitration clause covering all controversies arising from construction of or compliance with the declaration's provisions.


Headnotes

[1] A court must determine the threshold question of arbitrability before compelling parties to proceed with arbitration.

[2] The determination of whether a dispute is subject to arbitration is a question for the court, not an arbitrator.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“A trial court's role when considering applications to compel arbitration under section 682.03, Florida Statutes, is limited to determining (1) whether a valid written agreement exists containing an arbitration clause, (2) whether an arbitrable issue exists, and (3) whether the right to arbitrate has been waived.”

Establishes the three-part test for determining arbitrability that courts must apply

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Charles Doan owned two units at Amelia Retreat condominium on Amelia Island, Florida. The Declaration of Condominium required unit owners to obtain bo…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a nonfinal order. Appellant brings this appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(v) and contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss and compel arbitration.

Appellant is the owner of two units at Amelia Retreat, a condominium development on Amelia Island in Nassau County, Florida. The “Declaration of Condominium of Amelia Retreat” (the declaration) requires that unit owners who wish to sell or lease their units for more than one year must first give written notice to the condominium’s board of directors, who must then approve the sale or lease. The declaration also provides that members must arbitrate any controversy arising from the construction of or compliance with any provision of the declaration. The declaration cannot be amended except by super-majority vote.

The members of the condominium association did not amend the declaration but did amend the bylaws of the condominium association to prohibit unit owners from entering into leases of their units for periods of less than 30 days. Appellant disputed the validity of the amendment to the bylaws, contending that it was invalid as inconsistent with the declaration.

Appellee condominium association brought suit for declaratory judgment as to the validity of the amendment. Appellant moved to dismiss the complaint, contending that determining the validity of the amendment would require construction of the declaration. The trial court denied the motion, and this appeal followed.

A trial court’s role when considering applications to compel arbitration under section 682.03, Florida Statutes, is limited to determining (1) whether a valid written agreement exists containing an arbitration clause, (2) whether an arbitrable issue exists, and (3) whether the right to arbitrate has been waived. Piercy v. School Board of Washington County, 576 So. 2d 806, 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Manalili v. Commercial Mowing and Grading, 442 So. 2d 411, 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Any doubt should be resolved in favor of arbitration. Ronbeck Construction Company v. Savanna Club Corporation, 592 So. 2d 344, 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

The trial court, in passing on the amendment to the bylaws, would necessarily have to construe the declaration to determine whether that document impliedly permits unit owners to enter into short-term leases. Accordingly, the claim raised in appellee’s suit for declaratory judgment was arbitra-ble, and the trial court erred in denying arbitration.

We reject appellee’s argument that the absence of a transcript of the hearing on the motion below compels affirmance. The only issue was whether passing on the validity of the amendment would require the construction of any provision of the declaration. This issue was purely legal and could have been resolved by reference to the complaint, supporting documents, and motion to dismiss/compel arbitration. Ronbeck at 348.

The order appealed from is reversed, and this cause is remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

BOOTH, SMITH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rittman v. Allstate Ins. Co., 727 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
    …nding arbitration, a pure issue of law. Therefore, the absence of a transcript of proceedings in the lower tribunal does not require affirmance of the trial court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss. See Doan v. Amelia Retreat Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 604 So. 2d 1292, 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The statute applicable, section 627.736(5), Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: (5)... Every insurer shall include a provision in its policy for personal injury protection benefits for binding arbitration of an…
  • Island House Developers, Inc. v. Amac Constr., Inc., 686 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
    …8,2 682.02, 682.03, Fla.Stat.; Castro v. Sangles, 637 So. 2d 989, 990-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (holding construction contract unenforceable pursuant to section 489.128 because contractor was unlicensed); Doan v. Amelia Retreat Condominium Assoc., Inc., 604 So. 2d 1292, 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (trial court’s role in [*1378] considering motion to compel arbitration, inter alia, to determine whether valid written agreement exists containing arbitration clause). However, the trial court declined to make a finding on…
  • John B. Goodman Ltd. P'ship v. THF Constr., Inc., 321 F.3d 1094 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …hat when considering motions to compel arbitration under the Florida Arbitration Code, trial courts are to determine "whether a valid written agreement exists containing an arbitration clause,” see e.g. Doan v. Amelia Retreat Condo. Assoc., Inc., 604 So. 2d 1292, 1293 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1992), the Supreme Court of Florida has stated the question differently: "Under both the federal statutory provisions and Florida’s arbitration code,” trial courts are to determine "whether a valid written agreement to arbitra…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw