CRAIG CARNAHAN, APPELLANT,
v.
ALEXANDER PROUDFOOT COMPANY WORLD HEADQUARTERS, A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND ITS AFFILIATE, ALEXANDER PROUDFOOT COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA, A SWISS GMBH, APPELLEES
CRAIG CARNAHAN, APPELLANT,
ALEXANDER PROUDFOOT COMPANY WORLD HEADQUARTERS, A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND ITS AFFILIATE, ALEXANDER PROUDFOOT COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA, A SWISS GMBH, APPELLEES
605 So. 2d 145
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1992)
Opinion of the Court
[*146] PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY and STONE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.
Concurrence
ANSTEAD, Judge,
concurring specially.
Although I agree with the appellant that there may be some appearance of conflict between this court’s resolution without opinion of his earlier appeal, and the results in two subsequent and similar appeals in other cases, I agree with the majority that we cannot go behind the “PCA” by another panel in the first appeal, and, in essence, set that opinion aside. This is especially true when we have no way of knowing the precise basis for the panel’s decision in the earlier appeal. Cf. Alexander Proudfoot Co. World Headquarters v. Baillie, 584 So. 2d 183-84 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (Glickstein, C.J., dissenting in part).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Alexander Proudfoot Co. World Headquarters & Alexander Proudfoot Co. of Canada v. Baillie, 584 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)