JOELLE KOEHLER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOELLE KOEHLER, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
605 So. 2d 149
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order under review is affirmed on authority of Larson v. State, 572 So. 2d 1368 (Fla.1991). This ruling is without prejudice to appellant to petition the trial court for modification of the occupational restriction.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Deep Lagoon Boat Club, Ltd. v. Sheridan, 784 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…vities very closely linked or causally related to the construction of the project.” See Conservancy, Inc. v. A. Vernon Allen Builder, Inc., 580 So. 2d 772, 777 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Florida Power Corp., Inc. v. Department of Environmental Regulation, 605 So. 2d 149, 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Some of the secondary impacts Ms. Sheridan was concerned about related to increased motorboat traffic and resulting hazards to the manatee population in these coastal waters. . Gordon v. Gordon, 59 So. 2d 40, 44 (Fla.1952)…
-
Fla. Power Corp. v. State, 638 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…of mandamus and dismissed the complaint with prejudice, based on FPC’s failure to properly exhaust its administrative remedies. This court affirmed the circuit court’s action in Florida Power Corp., Inc. v. State, Dept. of Environmental Regulation, 605 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), noting that we have previously recognized that DER may consider the “secondary impacts” which will result from a project if a permit necessary for its implementation is granted. We found that it could not be said that DER’s clai…
Authorities Cited
- Myren Wayne Larson v. State, 572 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1991)