STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION AND GEORGE STUART, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION; HUGO J. RUIZ, ESTHER F. ALVARES, RENE L. ARES, OSCAR A. CEDENO, ROBERTO R. GARCIA, ALREDO D. GONZALEZ, PEDRO I. HERRERO AND CONSTANTINO TAUIL, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION AND GEORGE STUART, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION; HUGO J. RUIZ, ESTHER F. ALVARES, RENE L. ARES, OSCAR A. CEDENO, ROBERTO R. GARCIA, ALREDO D. GONZALEZ, PEDRO I. HERRERO AND CONSTANTINO TAUIL, APPELLANTS,
STATE OF FLORIDA, BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, APPELLEE
605 So. 2d 170
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The record does not reveal that the question of the appellee’s standing was properly presented for consideration by the trial court. Therefore, we do not consider the issue of the appellee’s standing and the order is affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979).
BOOTH, MINER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sherrill Turner v. Singletary, 623 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…ade an adequate showing on this point. Accordingly, we conclude that the petition and DOC’s response do not conclusively establish that appellant is not entitled to relief, in part, as requested in his petition. As we did in Cridland v. Singletary, 605 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing with respect to DOC’s denial of credit for gain time while appellant was under medical disability or restrictions. REVERSED and REMANDED.…
-
Dixon v. Vaughn, 609 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…response to the order to show cause that appellant is not entitled to relief with respect to denial of gain-time, we remand this cause in order that the trial court may receive further evidence or argument on this point. See Cridland v. Singletary, 605 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In all other respects, appellant’s arguments on appeal are found to be without merit. Accordingly, the cause is REVERSED and REMANDED. SMITH, SHIVERS and KAHN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)