SONYA GALE, APPELLANT,
v.
TURNBERRY ISLE SOUTH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-09-29
No. 91-3054
Before BASKIN, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
605 So. 2d 175 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Jaar v. University of Miami, 474 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 484 So. 2d 10 (Fla.1986); Constellation Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Harrington, 467 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. Basso, 393 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); City of Coral Gables v. Baljet, 250 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Earnest Bell v. State, 614 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
    …to criminal prosecution. Breedlove v. State, 580 So. 2d at 608. These two questions were extremely relevant to Charles’ credibility and were the proper subject of cross-examination. See Breedlove v. State, 580 So. 2d at 607-08; DeAngelis v. State, 605 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Williams v. State, 600 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Moreno v. State, 418 So. 2d 1223, 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Watts v. State, 450 So. 2d 265, 267-68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Hannah v. State, 432 So. 2d 631, 631-32 (Fla. 3…
  • Douglas v. State, 627 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
    …d 579 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), in which this court stated that a criminal defendant has an absolute right to bring out circumstances which might indicate possible motive or self-interest with respect to the testimony. Id. at 580. See DeAngelis v. State, 605 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (conviction reversed where defense counsel was not allowed to delve fully into pending criminal charges and their treatment by the state). In Bell v. State, 614 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), the defense asked a prosecution witn…
  • Mac Ray Wright v. State, 633 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
    …ich is the maximum under the permitted range, is error because sentencing within the permitted range without written reason rather than the recommended range was not a part of the statute at the time he committed his offense. See DeAngelis v. State, 605 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 582 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); see generally Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987). Accordingly, this case is remanded for the trial court to resentence appellant within the r…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw