LEROY TOOMBS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1992-09-30
No. 92-479
JOANOS, C.J., and ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.
605 So. 2d 952 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Toombs has appealed an habitual offender sentence imposed after his conviction by jury of the sale of cocaine. The habitual offender statute requires that certain findings be made before the enhanced penalties afforded by that statute may be applied. § 775.084(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). See Walker v. State, 462 So. 2d 452 (Fla.1985); Knickerbocker v. State, 604 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Rome v. State, 603 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Because the trial court herein failed to make the required findings, Toombs’ sentence is reversed, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

JOANOS, C.J., and ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Toombs, 620 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 1993)
    …PER CURIAM. We review Toombs v. State, 605 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), on the ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The decision of the district court of appeal is quashed on the authority of State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla.1993), and the case is remanded for proceedi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw