STEPHENS TRUCKING CO. AND CLAIMS CENTER, APPELLANTS,
v.
JIMMIE BIBBS, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Medical Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Appellants, employer/carrier, appeal the judge of compensation claims’ order finding appellee’s cervical spine condition compensable and awarding temporary total disability and medical benefits as well as attorney’s fees. We reverse.
In Stephens Trucking Co. v. Bibbs, 569 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), this court reversed the judge of compensation claims’ initial award of benefits in this case and remanded for the taking of further evidence on the issue of causation. Upon remand, the only additional evidence offered was a second deposition of Dr. Aung-Din, which we find still does not provide competent, substantial evidence that a causal relationship exists between appel-lee’s cervical spine condition and any work-related incident or incidents for which employer/carrier can be held responsible. Therefore, we reverse the judge of compensation claims’ finding of compensability in this case and his consequent award of benefits.
REVERSED.
ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.W. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 164 So. 3d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…ren & Families, 769 So. 2d 513, 513-14 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (holding that the proper remedy to review an order entered upon relinquishment of jurisdiction in an appeal of a final judgment was to file a separate appeal); Lurie v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 605 So. 2d 1023, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (explaining that an order entered upon relinquishment of jurisdiction that is appealable under rule 9.130 results in a separate appeal that “could either be disposed of prior to further proceedings in [the first appeal], or…
-
United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Bellefeuille, 723 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…the juror could have been filed. Defendant argues that appellate courts have relinquished jurisdiction in cases like this one, however, where the motion for juror interview has been filed after the case was on appeal. Lurie v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 605 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) and Industrial Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. v. Wilson, 537 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). In Lurie, the party who did not prevail in the trial court had not on its own undertaken to investigate the jurors, but rather after the appeal…1 / 2
-
McNULTY v. Bankunited, 140 So. 3d 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…the state, is that judicial economy is best served by leaving jurisdiction in the appellate court until the issuance of the mandate. See Arzoumanian v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass’n, 967 So. 2d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007): Lurie v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 605 So. 2d 1023, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 9.600(b) authorizes relinquishment of jurisdiction only for “specifically stated matters.” A movant wishing to overcome the presumption against relinquishment and obtain relief must therefor…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Stephens Trucking Co. & Claims Ctr. v. Bibbs, 569 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)