DANIEL EARLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DANIEL EARLE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
605 So. 2d 1326
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order revoking defendant’s community control. We also affirm defendant’s sentence upon revocation of probation of twenty years incarceration followed by a term of probation. See Poore v. State, 531 So. 2d 161, 164 (Fla.1988). We do not agree with defendant’s contention that at his original sentencing he had received a “true split sentence.” We con-elude instead that he had received straight probation.
However, because we agree with defendant’s contention that the record is ambiguous regarding the number of years probation to which defendant was sentenced upon revocation of probation, we remand this case to the trial court for clarification on that aspect.
LEHAN, C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kahn D. Campbell v. State, 255 So. 3d 901 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
Authorities Cited
- Poore v. State, 531 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1988)