ELIZABETH BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
ENTERPRISE LEASING CO. AND BANK ONE, COLUMBUS, N.A., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the statute of limitations applied to Count I, but the dismissal of Count II was in error.
Appellant filed an amended class action complaint. The trial court dismissed Count I based on the statute of limitations and Count II in error.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Class Action Complaint cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant brings this appeal from an order dismissing with prejudice her amended class action complaint. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The trial court correctly determined that the statute of limitations set forth in the Federal Truth in Lending Act was applicable to Count I of appellant’s complaint. 15 U.S.C. 1667d(c) (West & Supp.1991). As the lease in question had expired more than one year prior to the initiation of this action, the court correctly dismissed Count I. As to Count II of appellant’s complaint, appellee concedes that the trial court’s dismissal of this count was in error. Therefore, we reverse the order dismissing appellant’s complaint, only as to Count II.
Ruling on appellant’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees is deferred pending the outcome of her case in the lower court. If appellant prevails in the lower court, she would be entitled to attorney’s fees for the instant appeal.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
LETTS, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.