JOHN SAVAS, APPELLANT,
v.
JIM SMITH, SECRETARY OF STATE, AND YETEVA HIGHTOWER, ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL, DIVISION OF ELECTIONS, APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1992-10-30
No. 92-01036
DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.
606 So. 2d 515 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court which dismissed the amended complaint filed by John Savas because Mr. Savas had not alleged, and could not by further amendment allege, a cause of action. See Quinn v. Stone, 259 So. 2d 492 (Fla.1972); see also Duke v. Smith, 784 F.Supp. 865 (S.D.Fla.1992).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw