ESPRIT MIAMI, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
ORESTES L. VAZQUEZ, APPELLEE
ESPRIT MIAMI, INC., APPELLANT,
ORESTES L. VAZQUEZ, APPELLEE
606 So. 2d 626
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc., 579 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA1991), review denied, 591 So. 2d 180 (Fla.1991).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Santo J. Paniello v. Oakley G. Smith, 652 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Paniello v. Smith, 606 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 617 So. 2d 320 (Fla.1993); Drew v. Chambers, 133 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961).…
-
Paul and Fely Siguenza v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 121 So. 3d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…ied the agent. Moreover, even if this inference were reasonably drawn, it was clearly overcome and [*1129] refuted by the direct and unequivocal evidence that (as she explicitly stated over and over again) she called Citizens. See Paniello v. Smith, 606 So. 2d 626, 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (quoting Alan & Alan, Inc. v. Gulfstream Car Wash, Inc., 385 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (“It is a well-settled principle that a fact cannot be established by circumstantial evidence which is perfectly consistent with direc…
Authorities Cited
- Hapney v. Cent. Garage, Inc., 579 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)