WILLIE BUTLER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hopkins v. State, 632 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 1994)
  …HARDING, Justice. We have for review Hopkins v. State, 608 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the following question as being one of great public importance: Does a trial court commit fundamental error by failing to make the findings required by section 92.54(6), Flo…
• Sigmon v. State, 622 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …sent during videotaping of child victim’s testimony, he did not object to the trial court’s failure to make specific findings under section 92.53, Florida Statutes, and therefore failed to preserve this issue for appellate review); Hopkins v. State, 608 So. 2d 33, 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), review granted, 618 So. 2d 1368 (Fla.1992) (although defendant raised an objection to the trial court’s decision to permit the child victim to testify by closed-circuit television under section 92.54, Florida Statutes, that…
• Goodson v. State, 608 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
  …COBB, Judge. Affirmed. As in Butler v. State, 608 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) we certify as being of great public importance the following question to our supreme court: [*944] WHETHER THE CHAPTER 89-280 AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 775.-084(1)(A)1, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRIOR TO THEIR RE…