A. JANE MAHLER, APPELLANT,

v.

JAMES D. MAHLER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Gordon v. Gordon, 625 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …Accordingly, I would also hold that the husband at bar is not entitled to relief under rule 1.540(b), as he did not file a motion with the trial court within one year after the final judgment of dissolution was entered or taken. .In Loss v. Loss, 608 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), the author of the instant majority opinion notes in his dissent: In this case, the trial judge said on the record that the parties had agreed in his presence (but not on the record) to a comprehensive settlement agreement of th…
• Richardson v. Knight, 197 So. 3d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
  …and must also confirm that each party has discussed the MSA with their attorney and fully understands the terms. We dispelled any doubt concerning the necessity of obtaining explicit consent to an oral MSA on the record when we decided Loss v. Loss, 608 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). . There, we made clear on rehearing that: While it might seem to some that we are splitting hairs, Mrs. Loss’s suggestion that Dr. Loss nodded his head in agreement and failed to protest as the trial judge discussed the propose…
• Notarianni v. Notarianni, 622 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
  …he final judgment simply upon the wife’s motion for contempt without a pending petition for modification. Indeed, modification had not even been requested until the filing of the wife’s written petition submitted after the hearing. See Loss v. Loss, 608 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Finally, the trial court erred in failing to act upon the ex-husband’s request concerning his payment of real estate taxes and insurance to protect the former marital home prior to its sale. The ex-husband’s assertion that the…

Authorities Cited

• Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)