RAMON ANTONIO PEREZ, PETITIONER,

v.

HARRY SINGLETARY, SEC. OF FL. DEPT. OF CORR., ETC., RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Reynolds v. State, 660 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …2d 638 (1990); State v. Townsend, 635 So. 2d 949 (Fla.1994). Corroboration may be considered, if otherwise admissible, only after reliability has been resolved. However, this issue has not been preserved for appeal. Wright; Hopkins; Seaman v. State, 608 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Appellant’s third point is that the court erred in overruling Appellant’s objections at trial, that the four hearsay witnesses’ testimony was “cumulative.” Appellant asserts that the trial court did not sufficiently analyze the…
• Gray Mart, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 703 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …So. 2d 1063, 1066 (Fla.1992); Clay v. Prudential Ins. Co., 670 So. 2d 1153, 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 680 So. 2d 421 (Fla.1996); Dupree v. State, 615 So. 2d 713, 719 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 623 So. 2d 495 (Fla.1993); Seaman v. State 608 So. 2d 71, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). For these reasons, the order granting the demand for an appraisal below is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings. . Specifically, the appraisal provision in the policy was as follows: If we and you di…
• Corona v. State, 929 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …93] issue for appeal. See, e.g., Cardenas v. State, 816 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (change in law must be argued to trial court to preserve issue for review); Leveritt v. State, 817 So. 2d 891, 896-97 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (same); Seaman v. State, 608 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (same). Here, Corona made a generic argument pretrial that his “confrontation” rights were being violated, once the court determined that AC.’s hearsay statements were sufficiently reliable to be admitted. However, he never specif…

Authorities Cited

• Francois v. Louie L. Wainwright, 470 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1985)