CHARLES NATHAN FOX, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES NATHAN FOX, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
608 So. 2d 132
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant’s sole point on the merits presents only harmless error, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986), the convictions under review are affirmed. The cause is remanded for resentencing within the appropriate cell without including legal constraint points under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d. 6. The fact that the defendant was on felony bond when the offenses were committed does not permit such an assessment. Brown v. State, 569 So. 2d 1223 (Fla.1990); Mosely v. State, 543 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Mize v. State, 495 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carmine Annunziata v. State, 697 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…amendments to the sentencing guidelines, legal status points were not assessed against offenders merely because they were released on bond when they committed their offenses. Browning v. State, 625 So. 2d 960, 961 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Fox v. State, 608 So. 2d 132, 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Mosley v. State, 543 So. 2d 340, 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Jones v. State, 520 So. 2d 672, 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Mize v. State, 495 So. 2d 845, 846 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Generally, the definition of “legal status” under cons…
Authorities Cited
- State v. DiGUILIO, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)
- Brown v. State, 569 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 1990)
- Stooksbury v. State, 495 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Mize v. State, 495 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Mangle Mosley v. State, 543 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
- FOX v. State, 543 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)