ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
NORMA COZZO, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-11-10
Nos. 92-655, 91-2932 and 91-1753
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.
608 So. 2d 530 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Tomlinson v. State Farm Fire & Cos. Co., 579 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); General Ins. Co. v. Ramanovski, 443 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Britt, 393 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Industrial Fire & Cos. Ins. Co. v. Prygrocki, 422 So. 2d 314 (Fla.1982).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Grady v. State, 753 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
    …based on his experience and training, that he knew of no other use for this type of scale other than for the weighing of marijuana.1, 2 This fact distinguishes the cases of Williams v. State, 529 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) and Frazier v. State, 608 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) cited by Grady in support of. his position. In Williams and Frazier, the testimony of the officers did not, as here, eliminate the possibility that the triple beam scales found in the home of the defendants were used for purposes…
  • Gordon v. State, 639 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
    …it presented indicated that in order for cocaine to be smoked it was necessary to put it into a marijuana cigarette. Because no marijuana was present, the theory that the rolling papers were for innocent use was not disproved. See Frazier v. State, 608 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Dubose v. State, 560 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Consequently, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence on this count. We find unpersuasive appellant’s argument challenging his habitualization and affirm the sentence…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw