CASEY FRAZIER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Frazier appealed his convictions for cocaine possession with intent to deliver, marijuana possession, and drug paraphernalia possession following a warranted search of his residence. The court affirmed the drug convictions but reversed the drug paraphernalia conviction, holding that a police officer's opinion that a triple beam scale could be used to weigh drugs was insufficient evidence to prove it was designed for illegal use.
The court held that a police officer's opinion regarding the general use of a type of scale was insufficient to prove the scale was designed for weighing controlled substances. Because a triple beam scale is a legitimate item of private ownership and not inherently contraband, the State must present direct and probative evidence—not mere suspicion or opinion—that it was used, intended for use, or designed for use in measuring controlled substances.
[1] Evidence that a triple beam scale is commonly used to weigh controlled substances is insufficient to prove the scale was used, intended for use, or designed for use in we…
[2] A conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia requires proof that the item was used, intended for use, or designed for use in weighing or measuring controlled substan…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Cocaine and marijuana are contraband, meaning the possession of it is always illegal. However, a triple beam scale is a legitimate subject of private ownership and is not contraband.”
Establishes the critical distinction between inherently illegal items and legitimate items requiring evidence of illegal intent
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDuring a warranted search of Frazier's residence, officers found cocaine, marijuana, and an Ohaus triple beam scale on a nightstand in the master bedr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Possession Of Cocaine With Intent To Sell cases and more on FLexlaw
COWART, Judge.
The defendant appeals his convictions for (1) possession of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver,1 (2) possession of marijuana,2 and (3) possession of drug paraphernalia3 following a warranted search of the defendant’s residence which produced cocaine, marijuana and an Ohaus triple beam scale. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant’s convictions for possession of cocaine and marijuana and affirm those convictions but reverse his conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia.
Section 893.147(1), Florida Statutes, provides:
Use or Possession of Drug Paraphernalia—
It is unlawful for any person to use, or possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia:
Section 893.145(5), Florida Statutes, defines as drug paraphernalia:
(5) Scales and balances used, intended for use, or designed for use in weighing or measuring controlled substances.
The issue was considered in Williams v. State, 529 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), where the court held that the State failed to prove that a triple beam scale, seized incident to a search warrant, was “drug paraphernalia” under the statute, where the only evidence presented was testimony of a police officer that scales of the type seized were commonly used to weigh controlled substances. The court noted that there was no evidence presented that the defendant used or intended to use the scale for illegal purposes and there was no evidence that illegal drugs were used on the scale. The court found the State failed to show that the scale was “designed for use in weighing or measuring controlled substances.” See also Steele v. State, 561 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
In the instant case, a deputy sheriff testified that during the search of the trailer, he found an Ohaus triple beam scale on a night stand in the master bedroom. The deputy testified that in his opinion, the purpose of such scales in a private residence is to weigh out cocaine. No evidence was presented that any residue from a controlled substance was found on the scale or that the scale had ever been used for an illegal purpose. The State’s evidence in the form of the officer’s testimony regarding the general use of this type of scale was insufficient to prove that the scale was used, intended for use or “designed for use in weighing or measuring controlled substances” as required by the statute.
Cocaine and marijuana are contraband, meaning the possession of it is always illegal. However, a triple beam scale is a legitimate subject of private ownership and is not contraband. There must be evidence, not a mere opinion, that it has been used or intended for use or designed for use in measuring and weighing controlled substances. The suspicion and opinion of a police officer is not sufficient evidence to overcome every reasonable hypothesis of innocence in the absence of other more direct and probative evidence.
We affirm the defendant’s convictions relating to the possession of cocaine and marijuana and reverse the conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia, being Count Y in Circuit Court Case No. 89-8087. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur. . § 893.13(l)(a)l, Fla.Stat. . § 893.13(l)(e) & (f), Fla.Stat. .§ 893.147(1), Fla.Stat.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Grady v. State, 753 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…based on his experience and training, that he knew of no other use for this type of scale other than for the weighing of marijuana.1, 2 This fact distinguishes the cases of Williams v. State, 529 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) and Frazier v. State, 608 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) cited by Grady in support of. his position. In Williams and Frazier, the testimony of the officers did not, as here, eliminate the possibility that the triple beam scales found in the home of the defendants were used for purposes…
-
Gordon v. State, 639 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…it presented indicated that in order for cocaine to be smoked it was necessary to put it into a marijuana cigarette. Because no marijuana was present, the theory that the rolling papers were for innocent use was not disproved. See Frazier v. State, 608 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Dubose v. State, 560 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Consequently, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence on this count. We find unpersuasive appellant’s argument challenging his habitualization and affirm the sentence…
Authorities Cited
- Steele v. State, 561 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Williams v. State, 529 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)