STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

MICHAEL C. BROWER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Stewart v. State, 647 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
  …tewart’s claims. The events leading up to the trial court’s order represent a legal and procedural quagmire in the realm of habitual offender and guidelines sentencing law which we detailed in Stewart’s prior appearance before us. Stewart v. State, 608 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Following our remand, the trial court entered another order that Stewart appealed. Stewart then voluntarily dismissed this appeal. Stewart v. State, 619 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Stewart’s latest motion again challenged the…
• Wyche v. State, 624 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …cing documents. It appears the errors regarding the designation of felony degree resulted in concomitant sentences exceeding the statutory maximum for the convicted offenses. Such claims may be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Stewart v. State, 608 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Based upon our own examination of the record and the state’s concession of error, we have determined the trial court’s order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence must be reversed and remanded for resentencing. Upon rem…
• B.M. v. State, 625 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
  …mitment order of the juvenile judge should not be seized upon to salvage section 39.061 as it was written between October 1990 and October 1992. . Apparently the second district is in accord with the first and fourth Districts. See State v. Brower, 608 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA1992) (per curiam affirmance based on D.P.). The third district has not spoken on this issue.…

Authorities Cited

• In the Interest of B.H. v. State, 597 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
• In the Interest of D.P. v. State, 597 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)