JOSE SOLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1992-11-18
No. 92-2785
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and POLEN, JJ., concur.
608 So. 2d 555 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for relief under rule 3.850, and remand with instructions to the trial court to vacate appellant’s conviction and sentence and afford him a new trial. See Wright v. State, 604 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Angomas v. State, 611 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
    …LETTS, Judge. The state concedes that we must grant the writ of habeas corpus in this case. In fact, we have already required that two of the appellant’s codefendants receive new trials on exactly the same issue. See Soland v. State, 608 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Charles v. State, 565 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Accordingly, and without further elaboration, we grant the writ, vacate the appellant’s conviction and sentence, and remand for a new trial. PETITION GRANTED. ANSTEAD a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw