ERASTUS A. BARNARD, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCIS M. KING, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Erastus Barnard appealed orders striking a cross-bill and denying leave to amend it in an equity suit seeking to quiet title to homestead property by canceling a deficiency decree. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed, holding that since the answer and cross-bill were one pleading presenting the same facts, the final decree on the bill and answer rendered the matter res adjudicata, making the striking of the cross-bill harmless error.
The trial court did not err in striking the cross-bill or denying leave to amend it. Since the answer and cross-bill were one pleading stating the same facts, and a final decree had been entered on the bill and answer (which was not appealed), the matter became res adjudicata. The amended cross-bill presented no materially different case from that already finally adjudicated.
“The answer and cross-bill was one pleading and stated the same facts for answer and for cross-bill. The matters stated therein were adjudicated as between the parties by the decree made on bill and answer. Such decree rendered the matter res adjudicata, and it is final since no appeal was taken therefrom.”
Establishes the core holding that a single pleading combining answer and cross-bill presenting identical facts becomes res adjudicata once finally decided, preventing relitigation.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBarnard filed a bill in equity to cancel a deficiency decree as a cloud on title to property claimed as the homestead of a decedent. The defendants fi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Res Adjudicata cases and more on FLexlaw
Whitfield, J.
A bill in equity was filed to have cam' celled a stated deficiency decree as a cloud upon title to real estate alleged to be the homestead of a decedent, whose widow and heirs were complainants. An answer and cross-bill in one instrument was filed in which it is alleged that the property to which the title sought to be quieted is not in whole, if it is in part, a homestead, and that a portion of the land at least is subject to the lien of the decree. The cross-bill feature of the instrument filed as an answer and cross-bill seeks to affirmatively subject the land not found to be a homestead to the lien of the deficiency decree. The cause was heard on bill and answer, and the deficiency decree was by decree “declared null and void as a cloud upon the title of the complain ants to the above described lots.” This latter decree was not appealed from. An order denying a motion to strike a Us pendens filed upon the cross-bill was affirmed here. King v. Barnard, 66 Fla. 252, 63 South. Rep. 429. Subsequently the trial court on motion struck the cross-bill and denied an application to file an amended cross-bill. From these orders this appeal is taken.
The answer and cross-bill was one pleading and stated the same facts for answer and for cross-bill. The matters stated therein were adjudicated as between the parties by the decree made on bill and answer. Such decree rendered the matter res adjudicata, and it is final since no appeal was-taken therefrom. This being so there was no harmful error in striking the cross-bill. The application for leave to file an amended cross-bill presented no matters that would make a case materially different from that presented by the answer and finally adjudicated against the appellant here, so there was no error in denying leave to file the amended cross-bill, if it were otherwise proper practice.
Orders affirmed.
Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell and Hocker,' J. J., concur.