JAMES EUGENE SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1992-11-24
No. 91-3455
JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
608 So. 2d 578 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992) Caution
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

By our prior opinion of April 29, 1992, appellant’s judgment and sentence were reversed with directions to allow him to withdraw his plea because the record did not reflect an agreement among the parties and the trial judge that the issue appealed was dispositive. Appellant moved for rehearing of that opinion and jurisdiction was relinquished to the trial court for further proceedings. Trial counsel have executed a written stipulation that the issue is disposi-tive and that stipulation has been approved by the trial judge. Accordingly, we grant rehearing and withdraw our prior opinion in this cause.

The appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied and the case will proceed to a disposition on the merits. Time for service of the answer brief is extended to 20 days from date of this opinion.

JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • TW Servs. v. Aldrich, 659 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
    …ked paying the bill. The JCC similarly erred if she intended to authorize Dr. Hafling to provide psychological treatment to Claimant. Section 440.13 gives the employer the right of initial selection of a physician. Orange County Sch. Bd. v. Ebanks, 608 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (although it was not error for the JCC to order an evaluation as recommended by claimant’s treating chiropractor, the judge erred when he authorized the treating physician to select the neurologist or neurosurgeon to perform the…
  • Beneficial Payroll Servs., Inc. v. Tobon, 714 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
    …he order under review interferes with the employer’s and carrier’s prerogative to make the initial selection of a treating physician, as contemplated by section 440.13(2) and (3), Florida Statutes (1993). Cf. Orange County Sch. Bd. [*669] v. Ebanks, 608 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The order is otherwise AFFIRMED. BOOTH, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw