CO-OPERATIVE HOMESTEAD COMPANY, AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALBERT P. DICKMAN, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1914-12-09
Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Hocker and Whitfield, J. J., concur.
68 Fla. 462 Florida Supreme Court (1914) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Cockrell, J.

Cockrell, J.

This is an appeal from an order confirming a sale, consequent upon a. final decree in foreclosure. Nearly six months had elapsed between the entry of that order, and much more than six months after the final decree. All the assignments as argued, question the propriety of the final decree and interlocutory orders entered before that decree.

While an appeal from a final decree opens up all preceding orders, an appeal from a supplemental order merely carrying out that decree does not bring up the final decree. Judson Lumber Co. v. Patterson, decided this term. Order affirmed.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Hocker and Whitfield, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Princess Vladimir Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 154 Fla. 100 (Fla. 1944)
    …Judson Lumber Corp. v. Patterson, 68 Fla. 100, 66 So. 727. An [*107] appeal from a supplemental order merely carrying out the-final decree does not bring such final decree before the appellate court for review. Co-operative Homestead Co. v. Dickman, 68 Fla. 462, 67 So. 140. Nor does appeal from an order confirming a sale and denying motion to vacate it bring up for review the final decree under which the sale was had, this Court being without power to review a final decree from which no appeal was taken. O…
  • Spaulding v. Bozic, 102 Fla. 377 (Fla. 1931)
    …ous orders or decrees entered in the cause, but does not bring for review any subsequent orders or decrees. Hyer vs. Caro, 17 Fla. 332; Judson Lumber Corporation vs. Patterson, 68 Fla. 100, 66 Sou. 727; Co-operative Homestead Co. et al. vs. Dickman, 68 Fla. 462, 67 Sou. 140; Jackson vs. Jackson, 80 Fla. 557, 86 Sou. 510. Therefore, the court may not consider the questions raised under assignments numbered 4 to 7, inclusive. The record discloses no reversible error to have been committed in the proceeding…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw