JOEL ROBBINS, ETC., PETITIONER,
v.
SECTION 3 PROPERTY CORP., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Property Appraiser challenged a trial court's denial of his motion to strike a jury trial demand in a tax assessment case involving an agricultural exemption. The appellate court held that tax assessment challenges are equitable in nature and therefore do not carry a right to jury trial, quashing the lower court's order and certifying the issue to the Florida Supreme Court.
Tax assessment challenges are equitable in nature, and therefore there is no right to a jury trial in such cases. The court quashed the order denying the motion to strike and remanded for further proceedings, while certifying to the Florida Supreme Court the question of whether Article I, Section 22 of the Florida Constitution provides a right to jury trial in tax challenges of agricultural exemptions.
[1] Tax challenge cases implicate the equitable jurisdiction of the courts.
[2] Actions in equity do not fall within the protection of Article I, Section 22, of the Florida Constitution guaranteeing the right to a jury trial.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“where the right or remedy is equitable in nature there is no right to a jury trial”
Establishes the foundational principle that equitable actions do not carry jury trial rights
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJoel Robbins, Dade County's Property Appraiser, filed an action to contest the granting of an agricultural exemption to property owned by Section 3 Pr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Agricultural Exemption cases and more on FLexlaw
JORGENSON, Judge.
Joel Robbins, Dade County’s Property Appraiser, filed an action to contest the granting of an agricultural exemption to property owned by Section 3 Property Corporation. The owner filed a demand for a jury trial, and the Property Appraiser filed a motion to strike the demand. The trial court denied the motion to strike. The Property Appraiser now seeks review. For the reasons which follow, we grant certiorari, quash the order, and remand for further proceedings.
Tax challenge cases implicate the equitable jurisdiction of the courts. Powell v. Kelly, 223 So. 2d 305, 307 (Fla.1969) (taxpayer challenging tax assessments on timberlands); City of Tampa v. Palmer, 89 Fla. 514, 105 So. 115 (Fla.1925) (action to enforce payment of ad valorem taxes); Camp Phosphate Co. v. Allen, 77 Fla. 341, 81 So. 503 (Fla.1919) (taxpayer seeking injunction to prevent tax collector from selling the property to collect taxes). Section 194.171, Florida Statutes (1991), grants original jurisdiction at law to circuit courts in all matters relating to property taxation. The prior section, § 196.01, Florida Statutes (1967), however, specifically granted jurisdiction in tax assessment cases to chancery courts. This Court has characterized actions brought under Chapter 196, Florida Statutes (1967), the predecessor to Chapter 194, Florida Statutes (1991), as actions in equity. Dade County v. McArthur Jersey Farm Dairy, Inc., 214 So. 2d 362, 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Dade County Land Development Corp., v. Dade County, 157 So. 2d 142, 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), cert. denied, 165 So. 2d 177 (Fla.1964). See also Reid v. Lucom, 349 So. 2d 661, 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (recognizing that matters brought under current Chapter 196 are cognizable in equity), cert. denied, 358 So. 2d 132 (Fla.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 860, 99 S.Ct. 180, 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1978).
The right to a jury trial in a tax assessment challenge against an agricultural classification appears to be a question of first impression. However, it is well established that where the right or remedy is equitable in nature there is no right to a jury trial. Hawkins v. Rellim Inv. Co., 92 Fla. 784, 110 So. 350 (Fla.1926); Hathorne v. Panama Park Co., 44 Fla. 194, 32 So. 812 (Fla.1902); Hughes v. Hannah, 39 Fla. 365, 22 So. 613 (Fla.1897); Wiggins v. Williams, 36 Fla. 637, 18 So. 859 (Fla.1896). Thus, actions in equity do not fall within the protection of Article I, Section 22, of the Florida Constitution (1968) guaranteeing the right to a jury trial.
We recognize that the issue of whether a tract of land is to be classified as agricultural for tax assessment purposes involves questions of fact. Conrad v. Sapp, 252 So. 2d 225, 227 (Fla.1971). This, however, does not mean that such issues may be submitted to a jury. Issues of fact traditionally within the scope of courts of equity are decided by the courts. Lincoln Tower Corp. v. Dunhall’s-Florida, Inc., 61 So. 2d 474 (Fla.1952); See Greenwood v. Oates, 251 So. 2d 665 (Fla.1971) (court was trier of facts in case involving an agricultural classification).
The remedy sought in this tax challenge case is in the nature of an injunction and a declaratory judgment seeking the reinstatement of the Property Appraiser’s original assessment. The remedy is equitable in nature; therefore, the right to a jury trial does not apply. Hawkins, 92 Fla. at 788, 110 So. at 351; Hathorne, 44 Fla. at 196, 32 So. at 813; Hughes, 39 Fla. at 371, 22 So. at 615; Wiggins, 36 Fla. at 656, 18 So. at 865. Because this case presents a question of great public importance, we certify the following question to the supreme court:
Is there a right to a jury trial under Article I, Section 22 of the Florida Constitution (1968), in a tax action to challenge a Property Appraiser’s grant of an agricultural exemption?
We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, quash the order under review, and remand for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hansard Constr. Corp. v. Rite AID OF Fla., Inc., 783 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…iggins v. Williams, 36 Fla. 637, 18 So. 859 (Fla.1896). Thus, actions in equity do not fall within the protection of Article I, Section 22, of the Florida Constitution (1968) guaranteeing the right to a jury trial. Robbins v. Section 3 Prop. Corp., 609 So. 2d 670, 671-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), approved, 632 So. 2d 596 (Fla.1993). Appellants argue that the trial court erred in submitting count III of the counterclaim to the jury since appellees sought only equitable, statutory remedies under the Uniform Fraudul…
-
381651 Alberta, Ltd. v. 279298 Alberta, Ltd., 675 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…at the remedy sought is that historically, jury trials did not extend to “equitable demands enforced in courts of chancery.” See Hawkins v. Rellim Inv. Co., 92 Fla. 784, 788, 110 So. 350, 351 (1926). As stated in Robbins v. Section.3 Property Corp., 609 So. 2d 670, 671-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), approved, 632 So. 2d 596 (Fla.1993): [I]t is well established that where the right or remedy is equitable in nature there is no right to a jury trial. Hawkins v. Rel-lim Inv. Co., 92 Fla. 784, 110 So. 350 (Fla.1926); Hat…
-
Section 3 Prop. Corp. v. Robbins, 632 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 1993)…McDONALD, Justice. We accepted jurisdiction of Robbins v. Section 3 Property Corp., 609 So. 2d 670, 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), because the district court of appeal certified the following question as being of great public importance: Is there a right to a jury trial under Article I, Section 22 of the Florida Constitution (1968), in a tax action to…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (18 total)
- City of Tampa v. Palmer, 89 Fla. 514 (Fla. 1925)
- Camp Phosphate Co. v. Allen, 77 Fla. 341 (Fla. 1919)
- Wiggins & Johnson v. Williams, 36 Fla. 637 (Fla. 1895)
- Powell v. J. R. Kelly as Tax Collector of Bradford Cnty., 223 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 1969)
- Carroll v. State, 251 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1971)
- Hawkins v. Rellim Inv. Co., 92 Fla. 784 (Fla. 1926)
- Hughes v. Hannah, 39 Fla. 365 (Fla. 1897)
- Fitzgerald v. Intermountain Farmers Assn., 439 U.S. 860 (U.S. 1978)
- Johnson v. Meigs, 439 U.S. 860 (U.S. 1978)
- Hathorne v. Panama Park Co., 44 Fla. 194 (Fla. 1902)