GARY LEE CLINGENPEEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Gain Time Credit cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Gary Lee Clingenpeel appeals the denial of his motion for correction of sentence which sought credit of previously earned gain time pursuant to Green v. State, 547 So. 2d 925 (Fla.1989). We reverse.
The appellant contends that he did not receive credit for gain-time earned when he was incarcerated on his original sentence. If this allegation is true, he may be entitled to relief. The trial court’s order fails to address the credit sought pursuant to Green.
Accordingly, we reverse the order of denial and remand for further proceedings. Should the trial court again deny the motion on remand, then it must attach portions of the record that refute the appellant’s allegation. Any party aggrieved by the subsequent action of the trial court must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain further appellate review.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Judd v. State, 666 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)…his issue. If this allegation is true, Judd may be entitled to relief. Accordingly, we reverse. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, then it must attach portions of the record that refute Judd’s claim. See Clingenpeel v. State, 610 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Reversed and remanded. SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Green, 547 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 1989)